Business Owner Confronts Me for Filming — Then Calls the Cops | Surprise Ending

SUPPORT MY CHANNEL BY BECOMING A MEMBER TO SEE THIS VIDEO EARLY!

Business Owner Confronts Me for Filming — Then Calls the Cops | Surprise Ending

I chose this spot at random. Just pulled up on Dixie Highway in Lantana, Florida, and started filming from the public sidewalk. No big plan. No script. Just exercising my First Amendment right to record in public. But within sixty seconds, I had company. Four people emerged from the auto shop, led by a man who introduced himself as Pedro.

Now, here’s the twist: Pedro isn’t his real name. I found out later he was actually Kevin, one of the shop’s owners. But for the moment, we’ll go with Pedro.

He wanted to know what I was doing. Why I was recording. I told him I couldn’t say. That I was working on something. He asked again, and again, I gave him the same answer. That’s when he told me I was on his property. I pointed to the ground and reminded him I was on a public sidewalk. Then he told me I couldn’t record. I pointed right back at his building’s security cameras and asked him if he planned to stop recording too.

Pedro wasn’t happy. But one of his brothers came out and tried to de-escalate, suggesting he walk away. I encouraged Pedro to take his brother’s advice. But instead, Pedro turned to me and asked, “Are you here to kill me?” I didn’t even get a chance to respond before he followed that up with, “I already know,” and walked off, dialing 911.

While Pedro was on the phone with dispatch, I kept talking with his brother. I explained that I make educational videos about public photography and our rights in public spaces. I mentioned the irony that calling the police on someone with a camera only ensures more cameras will show up — because officers wear body cams. He didn’t seem sold on the idea but stayed calm.

When I finished filming that angle, I moved around to the front of the shop. Pedro followed me there after wrapping up his call. I reminded him he’d offered to give me a tour. He said he would, but only if I told him what I wanted. I told him I didn’t want him wearing shoes while talking to me. To my surprise, he actually took off one of his shoes. I told him to take off the other. He didn’t.

We kept talking. I said I was just taking pictures in public. He said I should’ve come and explained myself. I told him this was a public sidewalk. He countered that he didn’t feel safe, that this was Dixie Highway and there were a lot of crazy people. He pointed to the sign and said I could just look them up on Sunbiz.

So later, I did. And it turned out the name and phone number on the sign didn’t match the business info on Sunbiz. A later conversation with one of the other owners revealed the reason: the city wants them to get a permit before they can update the sign. So it wasn’t deception—just bureaucracy.

Back in the moment, Pedro threw out the classic false equivalency: “How would you like it if I came to your house and recorded?” I asked him if he lived there. He said no. I reminded him again: this isn’t your house. This is public.

He told me again that he didn’t feel safe. I pointed to his security cameras. He claimed they didn’t record the street, just the shop. On a later return visit, I got to see the camera monitor. Not only do his cameras record the street, they capture the sidewalk and even a portion of the road.

That’s when Officer T. Simmons from the Lantana Police Department showed up. Before he even got out of the car, I told Pedro he wasn’t going to get my ID and I wasn’t going to be stopped.

When Simmons approached, he asked if I was filming for YouTube or Instagram. I respectfully told him I didn’t want to answer any questions. He didn’t press. That alone earned my respect.

Simmons turned to Pedro and asked what was going on. Pedro repeated his story—that I just showed up with a camera and he didn’t know who I was. He also claimed he didn’t feel safe and said he was worried I might come back later and shoot him. Not with a camera this time—with a gun.

Simmons asked if I had gone inside the business. Pedro said no. That was all Simmons needed. He explained that I was on public property and that I had every right to film. He even pointed out that he was wearing a body cam and recording. Pedro tried to say that was different, because he knew Simmons was a police officer.

Simmons responded perfectly: knowing who someone is doesn’t change what the law says.

He brought up Google Maps. He brought up real estate agents taking pictures of homes. He calmly explained that it’s all legal. He acknowledged Pedro’s discomfort but reminded him that discomfort doesn’t override the Constitution.

“Weird isn’t illegal,” Simmons said. And he was right.

Pedro eventually apologized. Simmons told him again that there was nothing illegal about what I was doing, and unless I entered the property, there was no action to take. That’s when his backup officer arrived.

Pedro turned back to me, still repeating that he didn’t know who I was. He said if I had just come inside and introduced myself, he would have shown me the shop. I told him law enforcement isn’t here to make people comfortable—they’re here to enforce the law. Simmons pulled Pedro aside for a private chat. I later obtained the body cam footage of that conversation through a public records request.

While they talked, I kept filming. I got shots of the patrol vehicles and circled around the property. Simmons came back and told Pedro again that his best option was to ignore me and make the video boring.

After the officers left, I returned to the side of the building and saw Pedro talking to what looked like his parts distributor. I asked if he wanted to give me that tour now. He told me to come back tomorrow. And bring lunch.

We continued to chat. He was still holding on to the idea that I should have explained myself. He reiterated again that he didn’t know who I was and that I could be dangerous. I reminded him: I have a camera and a microphone. Not a weapon.

I went home, looked up the business on Sunbiz, and tried calling the number listed on the sign. The line was busy. So I showed up in person the next day.

Pedro kept his word. He gave me a brief tour of some of the projects he was working on. Then we went to lunch. His treat. We ate at a local Guatemalan restaurant called El Pueblo Chapin. It was excellent. The food was flavorful, the staff was welcoming, and the conversation was surprisingly relaxed.

This isn’t how most audits end. And that’s the point.

Reflections on the Encounter

Not every audit is about confrontation. Sometimes it’s about clarity.

Pedro didn’t understand the law. That much was clear. His fear, while not legally grounded, was real to him. And that fear led him to make a 911 call over a man with a camera on a public sidewalk.

Officer Simmons, on the other hand, understood both the law and how to handle that fear. He didn’t panic. He didn’t escalate. He educated. And he did it all while staying professional and calm.

That’s the ideal outcome.

We live in a time when people’s first instinct is to assume the worst. A camera must mean exposure. A stranger must mean danger. But that mindset is exactly why First Amendment audits matter. They challenge that instinct. They force a conversation about rights and reactions.

Pedro went from asking if I was there to kill him to treating me to lunch.

Not because I caved.

Not because I stopped filming.

But because I stood my ground respectfully and let the law speak for itself.

Why This Audit Matters

This audit matters because it shows how things can go right. A business owner learned something. A police officer modeled what proper conduct looks like. And viewers get a real-life example of what exercising your rights calmly and confidently can achieve.

For every story that ends in aggression, there are others that end in understanding. But you don’t hear those stories as often. That’s why I document them.

This wasn’t just a video. It was a case study in public education. And accountability. And the power of showing up with a camera and holding a space long enough for people to reveal who they are.

Some reveal hostility. Others reveal reason. And some, like Pedro, reveal both.


If this video made you laugh or think, consider buying me an iced coffee:

👉 https://buymeacoffee.com/gcnn

Check out our sponsor, Raw Naked Bean — bold coffee for bold people:

Use code GCNN at checkout for free shipping:

👉 https://rawnakedbean.com/gcnn/?ref=GCNN

Don’t miss future videos:

Subscribe to the newsletter: https://goodcitizennewsnetwork.com/#newsletter


Legal Disclaimer: This video and blog post document a First Amendment-protected activity filmed entirely from publicly accessible areas. All individuals appearing were recorded lawfully in public where no reasonable expectation of privacy exists.

Location Details

Date of Audit: June 3, 2025

Physical Address: 602 N Dixie Highway Lantana, FL33462

Phone: (561) 598-3188

Prestigious Innovations' Social Media Accounts

Employee Details

Name: Kevin

Title: Owner

Disclaimer

The people appearing in my videos are in public spaces where there are no reasonable expectations of privacy. Recording in public is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. This video is for entertainment and educational purposes only. The legal topics covered on GCNN are designed to be educational and informative. They should never serve as legal advice under any circumstances. The content of this video is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, civilian rights, and emphasize the importance of exorcising your rights in a peaceful manner.

It's Free To Support GCNN By Sharing This Post To Your