When it comes to discipline and public service, we expect law enforcement and firefighters to set the standard. But during my latest First Amendment audit in Lake Worth, Florida, I witnessed two drastically different examples of professionalism in action—one from a Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy, and the other from a dedicated firefighter at Engine 91.

The Deputy Who Couldn’t Park Properly

While traveling between audit locations, I stumbled upon Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office patrol car #79017 parked illegally at a stop sign, facing the wrong way. The deputy in question, later identified as Officer Jason Hole (#31765), was responding to a call about illegal dumping. Rather than using an empty parking lot, he chose to park in an unsafe and unlawful manner.

When I called him out on it, there was no response—just a silent acknowledgment as he remained focused on the service call. This raises an important question: if everyday citizens are expected to follow traffic laws, shouldn’t law enforcement be held to the same standard? If there was no emergency requiring immediate action, why not park legally like everyone else?

The Firefighter Who Showed True Strength

Contrast that with my visit to Engine 91 Firehouse, where I witnessed a firefighter engaged in an impressive physical training routine. In full gear, he was flipping a massive 300-pound tire up and down the driveway, demonstrating the kind of discipline and endurance required to serve the public effectively.

It was an incredible sight—not just because of the sheer physical strength involved, but because it showed dedication to the job even when there wasn’t an active emergency. Just as I was admiring the mural painted on the firehouse wall, the team got a call. Within moments, they were suited up, in their truck, and out the door with lights flashing.

A Tale of Two Professions

Both law enforcement and firefighters play critical roles in public safety, but the contrast between these two encounters couldn’t have been clearer. One side showed questionable judgment, while the other demonstrated unwavering commitment.

So, I’ll leave it up to you—who set the better example? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

Support the Channel: If you appreciate this kind of reporting, consider buying me an iced coffee at buymeacoffee.com/gcnn. Your support helps keep these audits going!

Special thanks to our sponsor, Raw Naked Bean! Get free shipping on your coffee order by using code GCNN at checkout at rawnakedbean.com/gcnn.

Watch the Full Video Here: [Insert YouTube link]

While filming for a recent audit in Lake Worth, Florida, I stumbled upon something that perfectly illustrates the double standard in law enforcement. A Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy, responding to a call, decided that traffic laws didn’t apply to him—parking illegally at a stop sign, facing the wrong way.

At the time, I called him out on it, but he didn’t engage. Now, I’ve obtained the body cam footage from that very moment, and it raises an important question: Should the people enforcing the law be allowed to break it whenever it’s convenient?

The Incident: A Clear Violation

The deputy, identified as Officer Jason Hole (#31765), was responding to a call regarding illegal dumping. Despite an empty parking lot nearby, he chose to block a stop sign and park facing oncoming traffic—something that would get any regular citizen ticketed or towed. But as we often see, the rules seem to apply differently when you have a badge.

Body Cam Footage Tells the Story

Thanks to Florida’s public records laws, I was able to obtain the body cam footage of this deputy in action. It confirms what I saw that day—there was no active emergency, no immediate threat—just a blatant disregard for basic traffic laws.

Would a regular citizen get away with this? Doubtful. So why should law enforcement?

Watch the Full Video & Decide for Yourself

This isn’t about targeting individual officers—it’s about accountability. If law enforcement wants to maintain public trust, they need to follow the same laws they enforce.

Watch the full body cam footage here: https://youtu.be/Grb1ycmfELY

What do you think? Should officers be held to the same standard as the rest of us? Drop your thoughts in the comments!

Support the Channel: If you appreciate this kind of investigative work, consider buying me an iced coffee at buymeacoffee.com/gcnn. Every bit helps keep these audits going!

Big thanks to our sponsor, Raw Naked Bean! Get free shipping on your coffee order by using code GCNN at checkout at rawnakedbean.com/gcnn.

Chase Bank didn’t want to be filmed… so they called the cops—who filmed for me!! In my latest First Amendment audit in downtown West Palm Beach, I tested how banks react to public filming. Things took an ironic turn at Chase Bank, where a manager called the police on me—despite admitting he knew I had the right to film! Officer A. Forgione arrived, handled the situation professionally, and even educated the staff. But here’s the kicker: while Chase had an issue with me filming from the public sidewalk, the police went inside and recorded the bank themselves! You can’t make this up.

Over at Wells Fargo, the response was much calmer. A staff member asked if I was doing marketing, and when I said no, she simply went back inside. Unlike Chase, my camera had a clear view inside Wells Fargo—no glare blocking the footage.

After skipping the remaining stops due to low activity, I wrapped up the audit with a scenic outro at Lake Worth Lagoon, showcasing a stunning view of downtown West Palm Beach.

This one is packed with irony—you won’t want to miss it!

Watch the full Chase Bank didn’t want to be filmed… so they called the cops—who filmed for me!!  video to see the interactions unfold, and if you enjoy my work, consider supporting Good Citizen News Network at BuyMeACoffee.com/GCNN. Big thanks to my sponsor Raw Naked Bean—get free shipping on their coffee with code GCNN at RawNakedBean.com!

Welcome to Good Citizen News Network! Today, I’m sharing my experience conducting a First Amendment audit in the vibrant city of Belle Glade, Florida. My goal was to visit key public spaces to exercise and document our constitutional right to film in public and ensure transparency and accountability in government.

Here’s a detailed breakdown of my day, highlighting the places I visited and the encounters I had:

Belle Glade City Hall

I started my day at the Belle Glade City Hall. The interactions here were positive, and I was fortunate to meet Mayor Wilson. In a true show of hospitality, the mayor personally walked me across the parking lot to my next stop, the Lawrence E. Will Museum of the Glades.

Lawrence E. Will Museum of the Glades

At the museum, I met Cheryl Stein, who went above and beyond by giving me a personal tour. The museum captures the rich history of Belle Glade and the surrounding area, offering a glimpse into the heritage of this unique community. Cheryl’s enthusiasm and knowledge made this visit a highlight of my day.

Belle Glade Branch Library

Next, I stopped at the Belle Glade Branch Library. Libraries are cornerstones of public access to knowledge, and this location did not disappoint. Dawn, a staff member, greeted me warmly and even gave me a tour of the library. It was great to see how dedicated the staff is to serving the community.

Belle Glade Post Office

The post office experience was a mixed bag. While most of the staff were respectful and professional, one worker made an inappropriate comment, suggesting I might “blow up the building.” While this was disappointing, it’s worth noting that the majority of the staff were courteous and adhered to professional standards.

C. L. Brumback Glades Health Center

Unfortunately, the health center didn’t have much activity during my visit, so I decided not to keep any of the footage. It’s a reminder that sometimes, audits can be quieter than expected.

Torry Island Swing Bridge

I wrapped up my day at the historic Torry Island Swing Bridge. Built in 1935, it’s the oldest swing drawbridge in Florida and the only manually operated one in the state. This unique structure connects Belle Glade to Torry Island and represents a piece of local history that continues to serve the community.

Reflection on the Day

Overall, Belle Glade proved to be a welcoming and respectful community. From the hospitality of Mayor Wilson and Cheryl, to the professionalism of the library staff and the historic charm of the Torry Island Swing Bridge, this audit highlighted the importance of public spaces and the people who make them thrive.

While there were minor challenges, such as the comment at the post office, these moments reinforce why it’s essential to exercise our rights and encourage accountability.

Watch the Full Video

To see the full story, including footage of my encounters and the places I visited, check out the video on my YouTube channel embedded at the top of this page.

Thank you for following along, and remember to stay informed, stay vigilant, and stand up for your rights. Until next time!

First Amendment Audit at Sunnyside Dispensary – What Happened?

The First Amendment gives us the right to record on public sidewalks, but how often do businesses and the public truly understand and respect this right? In my latest audit, I visited Sunnyside Cannabis Dispensary to see how they would react to someone filming from the sidewalk.

Customer Reactions & Public Interactions

During the audit, I had a few interactions with customers. One moment that stood out was when a young woman and an elderly man were picking up their order from the drive-through window. The young woman asked me what my problem was and later questioned if I was getting paid for filming. The older man she was with looked like Dale from King of the Hill. He was making various gestures with his hands that looked like a middle finger or gang signs. As they pulled off, he displayed his Medical Marijuana card for the camera.

Another interesting encounter happened when a passerby stopped to ask if I was making a YouTube video. When I gave him my business card and explained that I was filming a First Amendment audit, he seemed pleased and even recommended other locations I could check out.

The Store Manager’s Response

At one point, the store manager came outside to confront me. However, once I explained that I was filming in public, he seemed okay with it. He mentioned that it was unusual for someone to film their store from the sidewalk but wanted to make sure I didn’t have any problems with the dispensary. Unlike some audits where businesses overreact, this one was fairly calm.

Challenges & Lessons Learned

One of the biggest challenges of the day was getting used to the DJI Osmo Mobile 6 gimbal. This was my first time using it, and while it helped stabilize my shots, there was definitely a learning curve. One of my takeaways for the day is I need to do a better job with my camera movements.I also wasn’t happy with the audio in this video and will use the DJI Mic Mini for the foreseeable future.

Watch the Full Audit Here!

What do you think? Did Sunnyside Dispensary handle this well? Could they use a refresher on public photography laws? Drop a comment on the video and let me know!

Support the Channel & Stay Connected

If you enjoyed this audit and want to see more, don’t forget to:

Subscribe to my YouTube channel: Good Citizen News Network

Your rights matter. Stay informed, keep filming, and let’s continue holding public spaces accountable. Thanks for watching and supporting the movement!

#FirstAmendmentAudit #PublicPhotography #KnowYourRights #SunnysideDispensary #GoodCitizenNewsNetwork

In the spirit of upholding First Amendment rights, I recently embarked on a visit to the Palm Beach County School District. This trip was inspired by Liberty Troll’s experience there last month, where his rights were blatantly violated.

During Liberty Troll’s visit, he encountered rudeness from a staff member named Dustin and was even ordered by security to turn off his camera. When he refused, things escalated, and Major Richard “Dick” Moore of the Palm Beach County School District Police Department trespassed him from public property.

After learning about this incident, I contacted Liberty Troll to discuss the situation. We decided it would be valuable to conduct my own audit and see how I would be treated.

Thankfully, my experience was significantly different. While there were some tense moments, there weren’t any major confrontations. Here’s a breakdown of what transpired:

• Patricia Coolahan, a school district analyst, did appear agitated about my presence and contacted the police.
• However, the responding officer, Cadillo, was professional and understanding of my First Amendment rights. We even had a cordial conversation.
• The security guard was friendly and even exchanged a few pleasantries with me.
• In contrast to Liberty Troll’s experience with Dustin, the front desk staff member, Kiera, was incredibly helpful. She assisted me with my public records request and ensured it reached the appropriate department promptly. I even received a response with the requested information a few days later, including details about Patricia Coolahan.

This audit experience highlights the importance of professionalism and respectful conduct within public service institutions. It also demonstrates how situations can vary depending on the individuals involved. While I may not have encountered the same hostility as Liberty Troll, my visit underscores the potential for misunderstandings and the need for clear communication regarding First Amendment rights.

This blog post serves as a record of my experience and aims to spark a conversation about transparency and accountability in public institutions. It’s crucial for citizens to understand their rights and for public servants to uphold them. Let’s continue to promote open dialogue and ensure everyone feels comfortable exercising their First Amendment freedoms.

Should bank employees feel threatened over a camera? The rise of auditors filming bank exteriors has sparked an unexpected tension. While the auditors see it as a routine practice to document potential safety hazards or suspicious activity, some banks feel threatened by this seemingly innocuous act. Understanding both perspectives sheds light on the concerns at play.

Auditors, often independent security consultants or investigative journalists, film bank facades for various reasons. They might be documenting the accessibility of entrances for disabled individuals, identifying poorly lit areas that could be security risks, or capturing footage of suspicious activity like loitering or attempted break-ins. This footage can be used as evidence for reports, highlighting potential security vulnerabilities for the bank’s benefit.

However, banks express discomfort with being filmed. Concerns range from privacy violations of customers entering and exiting to reputational damage if the footage captures negative aspects like long lines or protests. Additionally, some banks worry that filming might be a precursor to a more elaborate attack, with criminals using the footage to plan robberies.

It’s important to remember that filming on public sidewalks is generally legal. Public spaces offer little expectation of privacy, and auditors operating within legal boundaries have the right to document what they see. To mitigate bank anxieties, auditors could ensure transparency by informing the bank of their filming intentions and purpose.

One potential solution is for the the banks to use privacy screens on their computer monitors, and ensure monitors aren’t facing public view. This can be done with curtains, blinds, and or reflective tint. What they shouldn’t do is try to enforce their policies on lawabiding citizens as they cannot control what others do on public sidewalks.

Ultimately, both sides share a common goal: bank security. By fostering open communication and acknowledging the legitimacy of both filming and bank concerns, a collaborative approach can be reached. This ensures auditors can conduct their work effectively while respecting bank anxieties, leading to a safer and more secure banking environment for everyone. Should bank employees feel threatened over a camera? Tell me what you think in the video’s comment section.

Video Disclaimer

This video was filmed in public. As such, nobody appearing in this video had any expectation of privacy. Video is for entertainment and educational purposes only. The legal topics covered on GCNN are designed to be educational and informative. They should never serve as legal advice under any circumstances. The content of this video is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, civilian rights, and emphasize the importance of exorcising your rights in a peaceful manner.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.